- This is the first book for academic podcasters. With theoretical background as well as detailed practical instructions, this book explores the what, why and how of academic podcasting. - Podcasting is becoming an ever-more popular form of both creating knowledge and disseminating research to reach both academic and non-academic audiences. - Competing titles are solely concerned with podcasting as an object of study or as a how-to guide. This book is unique in that it brings together research into a subfield of podcasting, with arguments about why it is a normatively good thing for academia before synthesising this knowledge by detailing how to do it. This is the only book specifically about academic podcasting.

Podcasting scholarship is still in its nascent stages. The use of podcasting as a tool for scholarly and intellectual inquiry is a relatively new idea, to think about the medium as an alternative outlet for research output. Podcast or Perish maps out not simply a rationale for the deployment of podcasting as an outlet for open peer review, but also explores some real-world workflows for such a practice. At the forefront of merging these exciting fields, Lori Beckstead, Ian M. Cook, and Hannah McGregor have taken a novel approach to expanding the boundaries of scholarly knowledge by considering podcasting as a focal point for intellectual discussion, engagement, and exploration. By investigating the historical development of the norms of scholarly communication, the unique affordances of sound-based scholarship, and the transformative potential of new modes of knowledge production, Podcast or Perish is the call to action academia needs, by asking how podcasting might change the very ways we think about scholarly work.

- This is the first book for academic podcasters. With theoretical background as well as detailed practical instructions, this book explores the what, why and how of academic podcasting. - Podcasting is becoming an ever-more popular form of both creating knowledge and disseminating research to reach both academic and non-academic audiences. - Competing titles are solely concerned with podcasting as an object of study or as a how-to guide. This book is unique in that it brings together research into a subfield of podcasting, with arguments about why it is a normatively good thing for academia before synthesising this knowledge by detailing how to do it. This is the only book specifically about academic podcasting.

Through a series of empirically and theoretically informed reflections, Opening Up the University offers insights into the process of setting up and running programs that cater to displaced students. Including contributions from educators, administrators, practitioners, and students, this expansive collected volume aims to inspire and question those who are considering creating their own interventions, speaking to policy makers and university administrators on specific points relating to the access and success of refugees in higher education, and suggests concrete avenues for further action within existing academic structures.

Podcasting scholarship is still in its nascent stages. The use of podcasting as a tool for scholarly and intellectual inquiry is a relatively new idea, to think about the medium as an alternative outlet for research output. Podcast or Perish maps out not simply a rationale for the deployment of podcasting as an outlet for open peer review, but also explores some real-world workflows for such a practice. At the forefront of merging these exciting fields, Lori Beckstead, Ian M. Cook, and Hannah McGregor have taken a novel approach to expanding the boundaries of scholarly knowledge by considering podcasting as a focal point for intellectual discussion, engagement, and exploration. By investigating the historical development of the norms of scholarly communication, the unique affordances of sound-based scholarship, and the transformative potential of new modes of knowledge production, Podcast or Perish is the call to action academia needs, by asking how podcasting might change the very ways we think about scholarly work.